Skip to content

Monthly report

Chile's copper output, June 2020

Chile produced 466.5 kt of fine mine copper in June 2020. That is 0.68% less than in June 2019 (469.7 kt). In the 6 months to June 2020 it adds up to 2,832.1 kt, 2.54% more than in the same period a year earlier.

The 34 operations the table details produced 453.9 kt, 97.29% of the total; the rest comes from producers the table does not break down by operation.

What stands out

  • It is the lowest June since 2017.
  • In the twelve months to June 2020 the country adds up to 5,857.6 kt, 1.67% more than in the twelve before.
  • Sierra Gorda: its highest month of its series, which starts in October 2014, at 14.2 kt. Cochilco
  • Lomas Bayas: its lowest month since May 2018, at 5.6 kt. Cochilco
  • El Soldado: its lowest month since February 2018, at 3.1 kt. Cochilco

Chile's mine copper, June 2020

466.5 kt

0.68%against June 2019Cochilco

January to June 2020

2,832.1 kt

2.54%against the same period of 2019

Copper price, average of the month (LME)

260.5 ¢/lb

2.15%against June 2019Cochilco

Who rose and who fell

Added the most

In tonnes, against June 2019.

  1. Collahuasi+13.5 ktfrom 44.4 to 57.8Cochilco
  2. Chuquicamata+9.5 ktfrom 23 to 32.5Cochilco
  3. Andina+5.3 ktfrom 12.5 to 17.8Cochilco
  4. Sierra Gorda+4.9 ktfrom 9.4 to 14.2Cochilco
  5. Centinela Óxidos+3 ktfrom 5 to 8Cochilco

Lost the most

In tonnes, against June 2019.

  1. Centinela Sulfuros−9 ktfrom 18.2 to 9.2Cochilco
  2. Spence−8.5 ktfrom 18 to 9.5Cochilco
  3. El Teniente−6.4 ktfrom 36.1 to 29.7Cochilco
  4. Los Bronces−4.3 ktfrom 30.7 to 26.5Cochilco
  5. Los Pelambres−3.2 ktfrom 29 to 25.8Cochilco

Operation by operation, June 2020

Thousand tonnes of fine copper at 100% of each operation. Every row links to its source.

OperationJune 20202019ChangeYear to date 2020ChangeShare of totalSource
1Escondida105.8104.11.65%599.15.11%22.69%Cochilco
2Collahuasi57.844.430.35%32326.87%12.4%Cochilco
3Chuquicamata32.52341.11%179.58.07%6.96%Cochilco
4El Teniente29.736.117.85%206.21.62%6.36%Cochilco
5Los Bronces26.530.713.85%149.418.29%5.68%Cochilco
6Los Pelambres25.82911.08%188.51.31%5.53%Cochilco
7Radomiro Tomic21.224.212.37%125.71.32%4.54%Cochilco
8Andina17.812.542.22%91.99.67%3.81%Cochilco
9Sierra Gorda14.29.451.99%74.933.78%3.05%Cochilco
10Ministro Hales12.213.610.42%64.310.97%2.62%Cochilco
11Caserones11.713.614.12%70.31.75%2.5%Cochilco
12Spence9.51847.17%81.518.27%2.04%Cochilco
13Centinela Sulfuros9.218.249.31%74.825.26%1.98%Cochilco
14Candelaria8.788.62%55.411.66%1.86%Cochilco
15Zaldívar8.29.916.95%52.64.31%1.76%Cochilco
16Centinela Óxidos8560.9%46.811.99%1.72%Cochilco
17Antucoya6.35.95.97%40.47.7%1.34%Cochilco
18Cerro Colorado67.216.81%37.310.13%1.29%Cochilco
19Gabriela Mistral5.97.117.3%49.617.27%1.26%Cochilco
20Lomas Bayas5.66.512.61%36.78.08%1.21%Cochilco
21El Abra5.56.210.07%37.11.72%1.19%Cochilco
22Carmen de Andacollo4.43.816.68%31.65.2%0.95%Cochilco
23Salvador4.22.288.95%26.373.65%0.89%Cochilco
24El Soldado3.14.226.65%22.311.88%0.66%Cochilco
25Mantoverde33.516.36%17.815.85%0.63%Cochilco
26Mantos Blancos2.93.28.88%18.74.22%0.62%Cochilco
27Ojos del Salado (Lundin)2.22.45.67%13.67.09%0.48%Cochilco
28Michilla1.4130.17%9.1138.44%0.29%Cochilco
29Franke1.21.727.14%5.741.23%0.26%Cochilco
30Quebrada Blanca1.21.834.2%6.838.45%0.25%Cochilco
31Atacama Kozan1.11.11.55%6.68.7%0.23%Cochilco
32Pampa Camarones (mina y planta de cátodos)0.50—3.2—0.11%Cochilco
33Tres Valles0.40.522.4%2.722.51%0.08%Cochilco
34Cerro Negro0.30.537.85%2.315.93%0.07%Cochilco
Total of 34 operations453.9458.30.98%2,751.82.77%97.29%
Other producers, not detailed in the table12.611.411.13%80.34.7%2.71%
Chile total466.5469.70.68%2,832.12.54%100%Cochilco

The figures are those of Cochilco's monthly table of mine copper output by company, in kt and at 100% of each operation. Chile's total is the one the table prints. The sum of the operations, what is left for the other producers, the year-to-date figures and the changes are our own sums and differences on those figures. The sentences of this report are assembled from them: no language model is involved.