Skip to content

Monthly report

Chile's copper output, January 2022

Chile produced 425.7 kt of fine mine copper in January 2022. That is 7.01% less than in January 2021 (457.8 kt).

The 34 operations the table details produced 412.7 kt, 96.95% of the total; the rest comes from producers the table does not break down by operation.

What stands out

  • It is the lowest January of the series, which starts in 2014.
  • 7 months in a row below the same month a year earlier.
  • In the twelve months to January 2022 the country adds up to 5,592.8 kt, 2.41% less than in the twelve before.
  • Los Bronces: its lowest month since November 2019, at 20 kt. Cochilco
  • Los Pelambres: its lowest month since April 2018, at 18.1 kt. Cochilco
  • Cerro Colorado: its lowest month since January 2019, at 3.9 kt. Cochilco
  • Salvador: its lowest month of its series, which starts in January 2014, at 1.6 kt. Cochilco

Chile's mine copper, January 2022

425.7 kt

7.01%against January 2021Cochilco

Copper price, average of the month (LME)

443.4 ¢/lb

22.65%against January 2021Cochilco

Who rose and who fell

Added the most

In tonnes, against January 2021.

  1. Spence+6.8 ktfrom 11.6 to 18.4Cochilco
  2. Andina+5.2 ktfrom 13.6 to 18.8Cochilco
  3. Gabriela Mistral+3.9 ktfrom 6.4 to 10.3Cochilco
  4. Caserones+3.7 ktfrom 8.8 to 12.4Cochilco
  5. Candelaria+3.3 ktfrom 9 to 12.3Cochilco

Lost the most

In tonnes, against January 2021.

  1. Chuquicamata−12.7 ktfrom 29.1 to 16.4Cochilco
  2. Los Pelambres−10.7 ktfrom 28.8 to 18.1Cochilco
  3. Ministro Hales−6.2 ktfrom 17.8 to 11.6Cochilco
  4. Collahuasi−5.7 ktfrom 57 to 51.3Cochilco
  5. El Teniente−4.9 ktfrom 39.1 to 34.2Cochilco

Operation by operation, January 2022

Thousand tonnes of fine copper at 100% of each operation. Every row links to its source.

OperationJanuary 20222021ChangeYear to date 2022ChangeShare of totalSource
1Escondida8184.74.33%814.33%19.03%Cochilco
2Collahuasi51.3579.98%51.39.98%12.06%Cochilco
3El Teniente34.239.112.59%34.212.59%8.03%Cochilco
4Radomiro Tomic20.522.59.05%20.59.05%4.81%Cochilco
5Los Bronces2024.518.3%2018.3%4.71%Cochilco
6Andina18.813.638.13%18.838.13%4.43%Cochilco
7Spence18.411.658.23%18.458.23%4.31%Cochilco
8Los Pelambres18.128.837.1%18.137.1%4.26%Cochilco
9Chuquicamata16.429.143.62%16.443.62%3.85%Cochilco
10Sierra Gorda14.511.625.38%14.525.38%3.41%Cochilco
11Caserones12.48.841.79%12.441.79%2.92%Cochilco
12Centinela Sulfuros12.41622.42%12.422.42%2.92%Cochilco
13Candelaria12.3936.94%12.336.94%2.9%Cochilco
14Ministro Hales11.617.834.71%11.634.71%2.73%Cochilco
15Gabriela Mistral10.36.460.81%10.360.81%2.42%Cochilco
16Zaldívar8.37.313.2%8.313.2%1.94%Cochilco
17Centinela Óxidos7.67.83.19%7.63.19%1.78%Cochilco
18Antucoya6.56.84.79%6.54.79%1.52%Cochilco
19Lomas Bayas65.411.19%611.19%1.41%Cochilco
20El Abra5.76.715.24%5.715.24%1.34%Cochilco
21Mantoverde4.13.130.6%4.130.6%0.96%Cochilco
22Cerro Colorado3.94.512.42%3.912.42%0.92%Cochilco
23Mantos Blancos3.53.76.8%3.56.8%0.81%Cochilco
24Carmen de Andacollo3.14.431.14%3.131.14%0.72%Cochilco
25El Soldado2.93.722.29%2.922.29%0.68%Cochilco
26Ojos del Salado (Lundin)2.32.30.51%2.30.51%0.55%Cochilco
27Salvador1.64.563.98%1.663.98%0.38%Cochilco
28Michilla1.31.724.3%1.324.3%0.31%Cochilco
29Atacama Kozan0.9112.54%0.912.54%0.21%Cochilco
30Franke0.91.120.59%0.920.59%0.2%Cochilco
31Quebrada Blanca0.8122.3%0.822.3%0.18%Cochilco
32Pampa Camarones (mina y planta de cátodos)0.40.742.9%0.442.9%0.09%Cochilco
33Tres Valles0.40.322.95%0.422.95%0.09%Cochilco
34Cerro Negro0.30.411.89%0.311.89%0.08%Cochilco
Total of 34 operations412.7447.27.7%412.77.7%96.95%
Other producers, not detailed in the table1310.721.96%1321.96%3.05%
Chile total425.7457.87.01%425.77.01%100%Cochilco

The figures are those of Cochilco's monthly table of mine copper output by company, in kt and at 100% of each operation. Chile's total is the one the table prints. The sum of the operations, what is left for the other producers, the year-to-date figures and the changes are our own sums and differences on those figures. The sentences of this report are assembled from them: no language model is involved.