Skip to content

Monthly report

Chile's copper output, March 2022

Chile produced 457.8 kt of fine mine copper in March 2022. That is 6.34% less than in March 2021 (488.8 kt). In the 3 months to March 2022 it adds up to 1,278.1 kt, 6.91% less than in the same period a year earlier.

The 34 operations the table details produced 445.4 kt, 97.3% of the total; the rest comes from producers the table does not break down by operation.

What stands out

  • It is the lowest March since 2017.
  • 9 months in a row below the same month a year earlier.
  • In the twelve months to March 2022 the country adds up to 5,530 kt, 3.04% less than in the twelve before.
  • Spence: its highest month of its series, which starts in January 2014, at 23.6 kt. Cochilco
  • Centinela Óxidos: its highest month since January 2019, at 8.2 kt. Cochilco

Chile's mine copper, March 2022

457.8 kt

6.34%against March 2021Cochilco

January to March 2022

1,278.1 kt

6.91%against the same period of 2021

Copper price, average of the month (LME)

464.4 ¢/lb

13.69%against March 2021Cochilco

Who rose and who fell

Added the most

In tonnes, against March 2021.

  1. Spence+8.7 ktfrom 14.9 to 23.6Cochilco
  2. Gabriela Mistral+5 ktfrom 5 to 9.9Cochilco
  3. Caserones+2.4 ktfrom 10 to 12.4Cochilco
  4. Candelaria+1.7 ktfrom 9.5 to 11.2Cochilco
  5. Radomiro Tomic+1.2 ktfrom 24.6 to 25.9Cochilco

Lost the most

In tonnes, against March 2021.

  1. Los Pelambres−11.2 ktfrom 32.5 to 21.3Cochilco
  2. Escondida−8.5 ktfrom 89.9 to 81.4Cochilco
  3. Los Bronces−6.7 ktfrom 30.1 to 23.5Cochilco
  4. Centinela Sulfuros−5.6 ktfrom 16.5 to 10.9Cochilco
  5. El Teniente−5.3 ktfrom 37.6 to 32.3Cochilco

Operation by operation, March 2022

Thousand tonnes of fine copper at 100% of each operation. Every row links to its source.

OperationMarch 20222021ChangeYear to date 2022ChangeShare of totalSource
1Escondida81.489.99.5%232.39.34%17.78%Cochilco
2Collahuasi51.2533.43%149.48.23%11.18%Cochilco
3Chuquicamata32.332.71.01%70.816.27%7.06%Cochilco
4El Teniente32.337.614.04%99.88.45%7.06%Cochilco
5Radomiro Tomic25.924.64.98%70.46.71%5.65%Cochilco
6Spence23.614.958.39%57.749.75%5.15%Cochilco
7Los Bronces23.530.122.1%65.416.93%5.12%Cochilco
8Los Pelambres21.332.534.36%55.736.57%4.65%Cochilco
9Andina16.917.43.25%50.312.34%3.68%Cochilco
10Ministro Hales15.316.67.74%37.428.55%3.35%Cochilco
11Sierra Gorda15.318.115.37%45.44.04%3.34%Cochilco
12Caserones12.41023.83%34.919%2.71%Cochilco
13Candelaria11.29.518.06%31.822.22%2.45%Cochilco
14Centinela Sulfuros10.916.533.94%32.927.34%2.38%Cochilco
15Gabriela Mistral9.9599.52%29.184.29%2.17%Cochilco
16Centinela Óxidos8.27.214.24%22.96.35%1.79%Cochilco
17Zaldívar7.57.41.68%233.72%1.64%Cochilco
18Antucoya6.3710.35%17.413.78%1.37%Cochilco
19Lomas Bayas65.411.11%17.611.42%1.31%Cochilco
20El Abra5.96.610.73%1711.59%1.29%Cochilco
21Cerro Colorado4.24.57.51%11.617.14%0.92%Cochilco
22Mantoverde4.23.615.9%12.329.37%0.91%Cochilco
23Carmen de Andacollo3.940.98%10.116.79%0.86%Cochilco
24Mantos Blancos3.63.85.49%10.50.69%0.78%Cochilco
25El Soldado2.93.17.9%8.415.5%0.62%Cochilco
26Salvador2.24.955.17%6.751.84%0.48%Cochilco
27Ojos del Salado (Lundin)2.12.39.05%6.210.63%0.47%Cochilco
28Michilla1.51.919.44%424.52%0.33%Cochilco
29Atacama Kozan10.96.89%2.91.47%0.22%Cochilco
30Quebrada Blanca0.8120%2.321.48%0.17%Cochilco
31Franke0.70.72.68%2.311.25%0.15%Cochilco
32Pampa Camarones (mina y planta de cátodos)0.60.69.84%1.431.28%0.12%Cochilco
33Tres Valles0.30.39.12%115.65%0.07%Cochilco
34Cerro Negro0.30.417.83%117.25%0.07%Cochilco
Total of 34 operations445.4473.96%1,241.86.95%97.3%
Other producers, not detailed in the table12.414.917.06%36.35.54%2.7%
Chile total457.8488.86.34%1,278.16.91%100%Cochilco

The figures are those of Cochilco's monthly table of mine copper output by company, in kt and at 100% of each operation. Chile's total is the one the table prints. The sum of the operations, what is left for the other producers, the year-to-date figures and the changes are our own sums and differences on those figures. The sentences of this report are assembled from them: no language model is involved.