Skip to content

Monthly report

Chile's copper output, October 2016

Chile produced 443.5 kt of fine mine copper in October 2016. That is 11.04% less than in October 2015 (498.6 kt). In the 10 months to October 2016 it adds up to 4,570.5 kt, 4.62% less than in the same period a year earlier.

The 33 operations the table details produced 431.7 kt, 97.33% of the total; the rest comes from producers the table does not break down by operation.

What stands out

  • In the twelve months to October 2016 the country adds up to 5,550.9 kt, 4.19% less than in the twelve before.
  • Escondida: its lowest month of its series, which starts in January 2014, at 58.2 kt. Cochilco
  • Caserones: its highest month of its series, which starts in January 2014, at 11.2 kt. Cochilco
  • Spence: its lowest month of its series, which starts in January 2014, at 9 kt. Cochilco
  • El Abra: its lowest month of its series, which starts in January 2014, at 7.6 kt. Cochilco
  • Franke: its lowest month since May 2014, at 1.2 kt. Cochilco

Chile's mine copper, October 2016

443.5 kt

11.04%against October 2015Cochilco

January to October 2016

4,570.5 kt

4.62%against the same period of 2015

Copper price, average of the month (LME)

214.6 ¢/lb

9.39%against October 2015Cochilco

Who rose and who fell

Added the most

In tonnes, against October 2015.

  1. Collahuasi+5.6 ktfrom 43.6 to 49.2Cochilco
  2. Los Pelambres+5.4 ktfrom 28.4 to 33.8Cochilco
  3. Antucoya+3.4 ktfrom 3.3 to 6.7Cochilco
  4. Centinela Sulfuros+2.1 ktfrom 11.9 to 14Cochilco
  5. Caserones+2.1 ktfrom 9.1 to 11.2Cochilco

Lost the most

In tonnes, against October 2015.

  1. Escondida−16.7 ktfrom 74.9 to 58.2Cochilco
  2. Chuquicamata−14.2 ktfrom 39.6 to 25.5Cochilco
  3. Los Bronces−13.3 ktfrom 39.7 to 26.4Cochilco
  4. Spence−8 ktfrom 17 to 9Cochilco
  5. Ministro Hales−4.5 ktfrom 22.4 to 17.9Cochilco

Operation by operation, October 2016

Thousand tonnes of fine copper at 100% of each operation. Every row links to its source.

OperationOctober 20162015ChangeYear to date 2016ChangeShare of totalSource
1Escondida58.274.922.3%820.618.15%13.12%Cochilco
2Collahuasi49.243.612.84%422.717.74%11.09%Cochilco
3El Teniente41.441.30.24%394.10.68%9.33%Cochilco
4Los Pelambres33.828.419.01%302.20.13%7.62%Cochilco
5Radomiro Tomic27.227.20.07%261.80.27%6.14%Cochilco
6Los Bronces26.439.733.55%259.321.51%5.95%Cochilco
7Chuquicamata25.539.635.75%254.22.13%5.74%Cochilco
8Ministro Hales17.922.420.09%201.53.44%4.04%Cochilco
9Andina17.618.75.88%158.215.04%3.97%Cochilco
10Centinela Sulfuros1411.917.65%134.910.3%3.16%Cochilco
11Caserones11.29.123.08%90.355.69%2.53%Cochilco
12Candelaria10.310.95.5%104.418.63%2.32%Cochilco
13Gabriela Mistral10.211.18.11%101.80.68%2.3%Cochilco
14Spence91747.06%134.75.41%2.03%Cochilco
15Zaldívar8.89.68.33%84.80.7%1.98%Cochilco
16Sierra Gorda8.68.42.38%80.512.75%1.94%Cochilco
17El Abra7.611.332.74%85.132.08%1.71%Cochilco
18Lomas Bayas7.16.59.23%66.114.56%1.6%Cochilco
19Antucoya6.73.3103.03%53.2867.27%1.51%Cochilco
20Salvador5.87.118.31%48.532.51%1.31%Cochilco
21Centinela Óxidos5.26.216.13%44.431.59%1.17%Cochilco
22Carmen de Andacollo4.86.222.58%58.91.34%1.08%Cochilco
23Mantos Blancos4.44.63.93%41.412.84%0.99%Cochilco
24Mantoverde4.13.88.32%42.55.1%0.93%Cochilco
25Cerro Colorado4.1631.67%667.14%0.92%Cochilco
26El Soldado42.652.61%37.325.03%0.9%Cochilco
27Quebrada Blanca3.13.10%2911.85%0.7%Cochilco
28Ojos del Salado (Lundin)2.12.10%21.41.42%0.47%Cochilco
29Atacama Kozan1.21.20%10.77.76%0.27%Cochilco
30Franke1.2240%14.511.59%0.27%Cochilco
31Cerro Negro0.50.58.23%4.54.09%0.12%Cochilco
32Tres Valles0.40.40%4.410.2%0.09%Cochilco
33Pampa Camarones (mina y planta de cátodos)0.0430.591.83%1.859.62%0.01%Cochilco
Total of 33 operations431.7481.310.31%4,435.63.94%97.33%
Other producers, not detailed in the table11.817.331.57%134.922.43%2.67%
Chile total443.5498.611.04%4,570.54.62%100%Cochilco

The figures are those of Cochilco's monthly table of mine copper output by company, in kt and at 100% of each operation. Chile's total is the one the table prints. The sum of the operations, what is left for the other producers, the year-to-date figures and the changes are our own sums and differences on those figures. The sentences of this report are assembled from them: no language model is involved.