Skip to content

Monthly report

Chile's copper output, May 2022

Chile produced 474.8 kt of fine mine copper in May 2022. That is 2.51% less than in May 2021 (487 kt). In the 5 months to May 2022 it adds up to 2,172.5 kt, 6.41% less than in the same period a year earlier.

The 34 operations the table details produced 463.5 kt, 97.63% of the total; the rest comes from producers the table does not break down by operation.

What stands out

  • It is the lowest May since 2017.
  • 11 months in a row below the same month a year earlier.
  • In the twelve months to May 2022 the country adds up to 5,476.1 kt, 3.74% less than in the twelve before.
  • Escondida: its highest month since October 2019, at 106.9 kt. Cochilco
  • Caserones: its highest month since May 2020, at 12.7 kt. Cochilco
  • Salvador: its lowest month of its series, which starts in January 2014, at 1.5 kt. Cochilco

Chile's mine copper, May 2022

474.8 kt

2.51%against May 2021Cochilco

January to May 2022

2,172.5 kt

6.41%against the same period of 2021

Copper price, average of the month (LME)

424.7 ¢/lb

8.06%against May 2021Cochilco

Who rose and who fell

Added the most

In tonnes, against May 2021.

  1. Escondida+22.2 ktfrom 84.7 to 106.9Cochilco
  2. Caserones+3.7 ktfrom 9 to 12.7Cochilco
  3. Chuquicamata+2.4 ktfrom 25.9 to 28.3Cochilco
  4. Mantoverde+0.5 ktfrom 3.8 to 4.3Cochilco
  5. Zaldívar+0.5 ktfrom 7.1 to 7.6Cochilco

Lost the most

In tonnes, against May 2021.

  1. Collahuasi−8.9 ktfrom 57.9 to 49Cochilco
  2. El Teniente−6.6 ktfrom 44.1 to 37.5Cochilco
  3. Los Pelambres−6.2 ktfrom 28.5 to 22.3Cochilco
  4. Los Bronces−2.9 ktfrom 27 to 24.1Cochilco
  5. Centinela Sulfuros−2.7 ktfrom 14.5 to 11.8Cochilco

Operation by operation, May 2022

Thousand tonnes of fine copper at 100% of each operation. Every row links to its source.

OperationMay 20222021ChangeYear to date 2022ChangeShare of totalSource
1Escondida106.984.726.18%427.10.12%22.52%Cochilco
2Collahuasi4957.915.42%240.313.48%10.32%Cochilco
3El Teniente37.544.114.9%168.810.76%7.9%Cochilco
4Chuquicamata28.325.99.44%120.811.15%5.96%Cochilco
5Radomiro Tomic25.225.20.25%1216.28%5.3%Cochilco
6Los Bronces24.12710.67%10620.04%5.08%Cochilco
7Los Pelambres22.328.521.75%98.132.61%4.69%Cochilco
8Spence2019.81.2%98.131.85%4.22%Cochilco
9Andina17.8181.24%80.27.6%3.75%Cochilco
10Sierra Gorda14.716.611.21%73.17.36%3.1%Cochilco
11Ministro Hales13.916.214.11%63.524.36%2.94%Cochilco
12Caserones12.7941.4%56.517.58%2.67%Cochilco
13Centinela Sulfuros11.814.518.76%55.127.22%2.48%Cochilco
14Gabriela Mistral10.410.21.91%49.746.65%2.2%Cochilco
15Candelaria9.910.12.31%54.119.87%2.08%Cochilco
16Zaldívar7.67.17.24%37.66.59%1.6%Cochilco
17Antucoya6.2711.84%29.810.94%1.31%Cochilco
18El Abra6.15.94.45%28.77.8%1.29%Cochilco
19Lomas Bayas65.74.63%29.18.84%1.26%Cochilco
20Centinela Óxidos5.77.321.87%36.68.17%1.2%Cochilco
21Cerro Colorado4.75.29.04%21.112.29%0.99%Cochilco
22Mantoverde4.33.813.82%20.823.01%0.9%Cochilco
23Mantos Blancos44.12.22%18.60.92%0.84%Cochilco
24Carmen de Andacollo3.13.818.75%17.58.13%0.65%Cochilco
25El Soldado2.64.442.49%13.225.02%0.54%Cochilco
26Ojos del Salado (Lundin)2.12.37.17%9.916.92%0.45%Cochilco
27Salvador1.53.759.47%11.149.36%0.31%Cochilco
28Michilla1.42.134.78%6.530.98%0.29%Cochilco
29Atacama Kozan1.21.16.74%5.20.98%0.25%Cochilco
30Quebrada Blanca0.8116.1%3.920.08%0.18%Cochilco
31Franke0.60.822.85%3.515.1%0.13%Cochilco
32Pampa Camarones (mina y planta de cátodos)0.60.519.16%2.517.6%0.13%Cochilco
33Cerro Negro0.30.417.17%1.617.44%0.07%Cochilco
34Tres Valles0.30.319.82%1.60%0.06%Cochilco
Total of 34 operations463.5474.12.24%2,111.56.45%97.63%
Other producers, not detailed in the table11.312.912.74%60.94.88%2.37%
Chile total474.84872.51%2,172.56.41%100%Cochilco

The figures are those of Cochilco's monthly table of mine copper output by company, in kt and at 100% of each operation. Chile's total is the one the table prints. The sum of the operations, what is left for the other producers, the year-to-date figures and the changes are our own sums and differences on those figures. The sentences of this report are assembled from them: no language model is involved.