Skip to content

Monthly report

Chile's copper output, March 2023

Chile produced 436.2 kt of fine mine copper in March 2023. That is 4.72% less than in March 2022 (457.8 kt). In the 3 months to March 2023 it adds up to 1,247.8 kt, 2.38% less than in the same period a year earlier.

The 34 operations the table details produced 421.6 kt, 96.64% of the total; the rest comes from producers the table does not break down by operation.

What stands out

  • It is the lowest March since 2017.
  • In the twelve months to March 2023 the country adds up to 5,300.2 kt, 4.16% less than in the twelve before.
  • El Abra: its highest month since December 2015, at 10 kt. Cochilco
  • Ministro Hales: its lowest month since November 2014, at 4.9 kt. Cochilco
  • Mantoverde: its lowest month since March 2020, at 2.6 kt. Cochilco

Chile's mine copper, March 2023

436.2 kt

4.72%against March 2022Cochilco

January to March 2023

1,247.8 kt

2.38%against the same period of 2022

Copper price, average of the month (LME)

400.8 ¢/lb

13.69%against March 2022Cochilco

Who rose and who fell

Added the most

In tonnes, against March 2022.

  1. Escondida+11 ktfrom 81.4 to 92.4Cochilco
  2. El Abra+4.1 ktfrom 5.9 to 10Cochilco
  3. Centinela Sulfuros+3.7 ktfrom 10.9 to 14.6Cochilco
  4. El Teniente+1.8 ktfrom 32.3 to 34.1Cochilco
  5. Los Pelambres+1.6 ktfrom 21.3 to 22.9Cochilco

Lost the most

In tonnes, against March 2022.

  1. Ministro Hales−10.4 ktfrom 15.3 to 4.9Cochilco
  2. Chuquicamata−9.4 ktfrom 32.3 to 22.9Cochilco
  3. Collahuasi−8.4 ktfrom 51.2 to 42.9Cochilco
  4. Radomiro Tomic−3.6 ktfrom 25.9 to 22.3Cochilco
  5. Spence−2.4 ktfrom 23.6 to 21.2Cochilco

Operation by operation, March 2023

Thousand tonnes of fine copper at 100% of each operation. Every row links to its source.

OperationMarch 20232022ChangeYear to date 2023ChangeShare of totalSource
1Escondida92.481.413.48%258.411.23%21.18%Cochilco
2Collahuasi42.951.216.31%129.813.14%9.82%Cochilco
3El Teniente34.132.35.55%95.84.03%7.82%Cochilco
4Chuquicamata22.932.329.18%63.710.05%5.25%Cochilco
5Los Pelambres22.921.37.46%619.56%5.25%Cochilco
6Radomiro Tomic22.325.913.98%71.51.56%5.1%Cochilco
7Los Bronces21.623.57.86%52.619.53%4.96%Cochilco
8Spence21.223.610.23%62.17.71%4.86%Cochilco
9Andina14.916.911.38%41.717.03%3.42%Cochilco
10Centinela Sulfuros14.610.933.63%38.216.08%3.34%Cochilco
11Sierra Gorda14.215.37.18%35.920.87%3.25%Cochilco
12Caserones12.512.40.86%335.52%2.86%Cochilco
13Candelaria10.711.24.67%33.96.59%2.45%Cochilco
14El Abra105.969.68%26.757.12%2.3%Cochilco
15Gabriela Mistral8.49.915.57%22.921.15%1.92%Cochilco
16Centinela Óxidos6.38.223.15%19.514.68%1.44%Cochilco
17Zaldívar6.37.516.48%2012.75%1.44%Cochilco
18Antucoya66.33.82%18.87.87%1.38%Cochilco
19Lomas Bayas5.2613.02%17.91.44%1.2%Cochilco
20Mantos Blancos53.639.11%14.134.95%1.14%Cochilco
21Ministro Hales4.915.367.77%2533.07%1.13%Cochilco
22Cerro Colorado4.24.20.38%123.41%0.96%Cochilco
23Carmen de Andacollo3.73.95.88%9.82.79%0.85%Cochilco
24El Soldado3.32.917.12%8.85.32%0.77%Cochilco
25Mantoverde2.64.238.25%8.530.48%0.59%Cochilco
26Salvador22.28.02%5.714.91%0.46%Cochilco
27Michilla1.51.50.73%40.3%0.35%Cochilco
28Ojos del Salado (Lundin)1.32.137.17%3.937.93%0.31%Cochilco
29Franke1.30.781.74%3.764.49%0.29%Cochilco
30Atacama Kozan1.115.85%2.610.24%0.24%Cochilco
31Quebrada Blanca0.50.834.38%1.916.12%0.12%Cochilco
32Pampa Camarones (mina y planta de cátodos)0.50.614.18%1.42.14%0.11%Cochilco
33Cerro Negro0.30.31.89%1.114.11%0.07%Cochilco
34Tres Valles0.10.359.1%0.459.12%0.03%Cochilco
Total of 34 operations421.6445.45.36%1,206.72.83%96.64%
Other producers, not detailed in the table14.612.418.39%41.113.14%3.36%
Chile total436.2457.84.72%1,247.82.38%100%Cochilco

The figures are those of Cochilco's monthly table of mine copper output by company, in kt and at 100% of each operation. Chile's total is the one the table prints. The sum of the operations, what is left for the other producers, the year-to-date figures and the changes are our own sums and differences on those figures. The sentences of this report are assembled from them: no language model is involved.